Pending Policies - Surgery


Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) for Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome (TIS)

Number:SUR705.025

Effective Date:08-15-2018

Coverage:

*CAREFULLY CHECK STATE REGULATIONS AND/OR THE MEMBER CONTRACT*

Implantation of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) device may be considered medically necessary when provided according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) humanitarian device exemption labeled indications, for treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) in skeletally immature patients.

Use of the VEPTR may be considered medically necessary in the treatment of progressive TIS due to rib and/or chest wall defects in infants/children between 6 months of age and skeletal maturity.

The VEPTR device should not be used in patients with the following conditions:

Inadequate bone strength in the ribs or spine where the VEPTR device attaches,

Absence of proximal ribs for attachment of the VEPTR device,

Absent diaphragmatic function,

Inadequate soft tissue for coverage of the VEPTR device,

Age below 6 months,

Age beyond skeletal maturity (about age 14 for girls and age 16 for boys),

Known allergy to any of the device materials, or

Infection at the operative site.

Implantation of the VEPTR device for indications other than TIS is considered experimental, investigational and/or unproven.

NOTE: Due to the complexity of thoracoplasty and the young age of the patient population undergoing such a procedure, implantation of the VEPTR should be performed in specialized centers. Preoperative evaluation should require input from a pediatric orthopedist, a pulmonologist, and a thoracic surgeon. In addition, preoperative evaluation should require (when possible) a test for positive nutritional, cardiac, and pulmonary function.

Description:

The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) is a curved rod placed vertically in the chest to help shape the thoracic cavity. It is being evaluated in skeletally immature patients with thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) to support thorax and lung development and in pediatric patients with scoliosis without TIS to slow or correct curve progression.

Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome

Thoracic insufficiency syndrome is the inability of the thorax to support normal respiration or lung growth. (1) The condition results from serious defects affecting the ribs or chest wall (e.g., severe scoliosis, with rib absence or rib fusion), and various hypoplastic thorax syndromes (e.g., Jeune Syndrome and Jarcho-Levin syndrome). Spine, chest, and lung growth are interdependent. (2) While the coexistence of chest wall and spinal deformity is well documented, this effect on lung growth is not completely understood.

Progressive TIS includes respiratory insufficiency, loss of chest wall mobility, worsening 3-dimensional thoracic deformity, and/or worsening pulmonary function tests. As a child grows, progressive thoracic deformity and rotation toward the concave side occurs with worsening respiratory compromise. This progression is often accompanied by a need for supplemental oxygen and can require mechanical ventilation.

Treatment

While spinal fusion is an approach to treatment, it may not be successful and may limit growth (lengthening) of the spine.

The VEPTR device is a curved rod placed vertically in the chest that helps to stabilize and shape the thoracic cavity. It is positioned either between ribs, or between the ribs and either the spine or pelvis. The VEPTR may be described as “rib based” growth-sparing instrumentation, which is compared with “spine based” growing rods for Cobb angle correction. The VEPTR device is designed to be expanded every 4 to 6 months as growth occurs and to be replaced if necessary. Some patients require multiple devices.

Regulatory Status

The VEPTR® (DePuy Synthes Spine, Raynham, MA) was initially cleared for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) through a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) for the treatment of TIS in skeletally immature patients. (3) In 2014, the VEPTR was cleared for marketing by the FDA through the 510(k) process. The VEPTR and VEPTR II™ devices are indicated for skeletally immature patients with severe progressive spinal deformities and/or 3-dimensional deformity of the thorax associated with or at risk of TIS. This would include patients with progressive congenital, neuromuscular, idiopathic, or syndromic scoliosis.

To identify potential TIS patients, the following are used:

Flail chest syndrome

Rib fusion and scoliosis

Hypoplastic thorax syndrome, including,

o Jeune syndrome;

o Achondroplasia;

o Jarcho-Levin syndrome;

o Ellis-van Creveld syndrome.

FDA product code: MDI.

Rationale:

This policy was originally developed in 2005 and has been updated periodically with searches of the MEDLINE database. The most recent literature update was performed through February 5, 2018.

Medical policies assess the clinical evidence to determine whether the use of a technology improves the net health outcome. Broadly defined, health outcomes are length of life, quality of life, and ability to function--including benefits and harms. Every clinical condition has specific outcomes that are important to patients and to managing the course of that condition. Validated outcome measures are necessary to ascertain whether a condition improves or worsens; and whether the magnitude of that change is clinically significant. The net health outcome is a balance of benefits and harms.

To assess whether the evidence is sufficient to draw conclusions about the net health outcome of a technology, 2 domains are examined: the relevance and the quality and credibility. To be relevant, studies must represent one or more intended clinical use of the technology in the intended population and compare an effective and appropriate alternative at a comparable intensity. For some conditions, the alternative will be supportive care or surveillance. The quality and credibility of the evidence depend on study design and conduct, minimizing bias and confounding that can generate incorrect findings. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is preferred to assess efficacy; however, in some circumstances, nonrandomized studies may be adequate. RCTs are rarely large enough or long enough to capture less common adverse events and long-term effects. Other types of studies can be used for these purposes and to assess generalizability to broader clinical populations and settings of clinical practice.

Thoracic insufficiency occurs in a limited patient population, and the literature on the use of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) consists mostly of case series from single institutions (some series are from specialized pediatric centers); no comparative trials have been identified.

Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome

Data submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) include an initial feasibility study involving 33 patients and a subsequent prospective study of 224 patients (214 with baseline data) at 7 study sites. (3) Of these, 94 had rib fusion, 93 had hypoplastic thoracic syndrome, 46 had progressive scoliosis, and 14 had flail chest as a cause of their TIS. Three- and 5-year follow-up rates for the multicenter study were approximately 95%. Of the 247 patients enrolled in either study, 12 (4.8%) patients died, and 2 withdrew. None of the deaths, as determined by investigators, were related to the VEPTR. Because standard pulmonary function testing was not possible for most of this population, an assisted ventilatory rating (AVR) was used to assess impact on respiratory status. The AVR ranged from 0 (unassisted breathing on room air) to 4 (full-time ventilatory support). In the multicenter prospective study, the AVR outcome improved or stabilized for 93% of the patients. Data were not reported for the number of patients who were no longer dependent on a ventilator.

Campbell (2004), who developed the VEPTR, and colleagues reported on 27 patients who had surgery for TIS and at least 2 years of follow-up data; this series was based on 41 patients treated between 1990 and the study reporting. (4) Entry criteria for this study were acceptance by pediatric general surgeon, pediatric pulmonologist, and pediatric orthopedist; age 6 months to skeletal maturity; progressive TIS; more than 10% reduction in height of the concave hemithorax; and 3 or more anomalous vertebrae, with 3 or more fused ribs at the apex of the deformity. Patients were followed up for an average of 3.2 (range, 2–12) years. Before surgery, the mean annual rate of progression was 15° per year (range, 2°–50° per year). Following surgery, the Cobb angle (of scoliosis) improved from 74° to a final value of 49°. Spine growth was at the rate of 0.8 cm per year. (Normal spinal growth is 0.6 cm/year for ages 5–10 years.) The final forced vital capacity (FVC) was 49% of predicted value in the 19 children who could complete pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Preoperatively, 1 patient required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and another needed supplemental oxygen for ventilatory support at final follow-up. Another publication (2013) from this group reported average 40.7-month follow-up (range, 25-78 months) in 24 children with nonsyndromic congenital scoliosis. (5) Twenty-three (95.8%) children had associated rib fusions, and the average age at surgery was 3.3 years (range, 0.7-12.5 years). With a mean of 5 expansion surgeries per patient (range, 1-10), the mean Cobb angle improved by 8.9° and mean thoracic height improved by 3.41 cm. Eight (33%) patients had a total of 16 adverse events, all of which required surgery.

In another series, Gadepalli et al. (2011) examined growth and pulmonary function in 26 children who received a VEPTR between 2006 and 2010. (6) The children underwent 29 insertions and 57 expansions, with an average of 3 surgeries per child. Each procedure required an average 0.97 days in the intensive care unit and 4.41 days in the hospital. The mean Cobb angle improved by 29%, from 64.7° preoperatively to 46.1° postoperatively. Lung volumes measured by yearly thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans were similar when corrected for age. Pulmonary function tests were performed every 6 months in patients (n=12) who were not ventilator-dependent and could cooperate with the procedure. Pulmonary function tests showed no significant change from baseline to follow-up in percent predicted values for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (54.6 L vs. 51.8 L), FVC (58.1 L vs. 55.9 L), or residual volume (145.3 L vs. 105.6 L), all respectively. Reoperation was required for 14 complications, 4 for chest tube placement (pneumothorax), 1 for seroma drainage, 6 for hardware removal (for infection), and 3 for hardware repositioning (for dislodgement). Another 22 complications were treated nonoperatively.

Emans et al. (2005) reported results on patients with TIS who underwent the procedure at Children’s Hospital in Boston from 1999 to 2005. (7) Thirty-one patients with fused ribs and TIS were treated; 4 patients had prior spinal arthrodesis with continued progression of deformity. Before surgery, all patients showed progressive spinal deformity, progressive chest deformity, or progressive hemithoracic constriction. The mean age was 4.2 years, and mean follow-up was 2.6 years (range: 0.5 to 5.4 years). A 3-member team selected patients for surgery, and cardiac function was evaluated preoperatively. Lengthening of the VEPTR was planned for every 4 to 6 months but often was longer due to intercurrent illness or difficulty with travel. The mean number of device lengthenings was 3.5 (range, 0–10). Six patients had device exchanges for growth. In 30 patients, spinal deformity was controlled, and growth continued (1.2 cm/yr) in the thoracic spine during treatment at rates similar to normal children. In this study, final FVC was 73.5% of predicted levels. Prior to the procedure, 2 patients were on ventilators and 3 patients required oxygen; at final follow-up, 1 patient required oxygen. Lung volume (measured by CT scan) in the operated lung increased from 157 cm3 preoperatively to 326 cm3 at the final follow-up visit.

Motoyama et al. (2006) from a children’s hospital reported on 10 patients with TIS. (8) Using a special portable pulmonary function test device, they reported on lung function in 10 children who had a VEPTR. Median age was 4.3 years (range, 1.8–9.8 years) at first test, and patients were followed an average of 22 months (range, 7–33 months). At baseline, FVC showed a moderate-to-severe decrease (69% of predicted), indicating the presence of significant restrictive lung defect. FVC increased significantly over time, with an average rate of 26.8% per year, similar to that of healthy children of comparative ages. In terms of percent predicted values, FVC did not change significantly between the baseline and last test (70.3%), indicating that in most children studied, lung growth kept up with body growth.

A series of 22 patients from another children’s hospital was published in 2007. (9) Seven (19%) of the 36 VEPTR units placed required revision, and 10 to 22 children reported better activity levels while 2 of 22 children reported better respiratory function.

Other series have discussed weight gain after use of VEPTR in TIS (10) or early changes in pulmonary function. (11)

Section Summary: Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome

The evidence evaluating use of VEPTR thoracoplasty to treat children with progressive TIS due to rib and/or chest wall defects consists of a few case series. TIS occurs in a limited patient population. For example, the Boston Center reported results on 31 children treated from 1999 to 2005. The natural history of progressive TIS is worsening pulmonary function and pulmonary insufficiency. Results from the case series reported by different specialty centers have demonstrated improvement and/or stabilization in key measures with use of the VEPTR in progressive TIS. This improvement has been noted in measures related to thoracic structure (e.g., Cobb angle for those with scoliosis), growth of the thoracic spine and lung volumes, and stable or improved ventilatory status. While pulmonary function testing is difficult to track in patients suffering with TIS, a study has demonstrated an age-specific increase in FVC; further still, that same study reported a final FVC in the range of 50% to 70% of predicted value. Given the usual disease course of worsening thoracic volume and ventilatory status, the stabilization and/or improvement in the clinical measures outlined above would be highly unlikely if not for the intervention. Taken together, these outcomes demonstrate the positive impact of using the VEPTR technology.

Scoliosis without Thoracic Insufficiency Syndrome

White et al. (2011) reported on the off-label use of spine-to-spine VEPTR to treat spinal deformity in 14 children without chest wall abnormalities. (12) The indications for the dual spine-to-spine rods were absence of a primary chest wall deformity, progression of spinal deformity to a Cobb angle of greater than 50 degrees, and migration of a previously placed proximal rib anchor or of a prior non-VEPTR growing rod to the point of loss of stable fixation. At final follow-up (24-48 months), there was an improvement in the Cobb angle from 74° to 57°, an increase in T1-S1 height from 260 to 296 mm, and no significant change in kyphosis. Complications occurred in 6 (43%) of 14 patients and included 3 rod fractures in 2 patients, 3 superficial infections, and 1 case of prominent hardware that threatened skin integrity. As noted by the authors, while results were similar to those obtained with other growing rods, “the high complication rates, need for multiple procedures in growing children, and small relative gains in radiographic parameters still challenge proof of efficacy of all such treatment methods.”

Using data from a prospective registry, Farlet et al. (2014) compared treatment of congenital scoliosis using VEPTR (n=22) with treatment using spinal fusion (n=27) or observation (n=184) (13) Function, pain, and mental health status were measured with the 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire. Compared with the observation group, the VEPTR group had higher total and image scores at the second and third visits and higher function scores at the third and fourth visits. Interpretation of this study is limited due to confounding factors, including age at treatment, unknown comorbidities, and the rationale for treatment selection.

Section Summary: Scoliosis Without TIS

The evidence evaluating use of VEPTR thoracoplasty to treat young children with early-onset scoliosis without TIS consists of a few case series. The VEPTR is being evaluated for curves greater than 45° in infants and juveniles without thoracic insufficiency. Similar to TIS, very limited data are available on the use of the VEPTR for early-onset scoliosis without thoracic insufficiency; additionally, little is known about the disease progression of early-onset scoliosis, and therefore little is known regarding the risk-benefit tradeoff of the VEPTR surgery.

Adverse Events

Complications that occur with VEPTR need to be considered by practitioners and families when discussing this procedure. Information on complications has been summarized using data from the FDA review and the articles by Campbell and Emans. (3, 4, 7) Up to 25% of patients may experience device migration, including rib erosion. Approximately 10% of patients had infection-related complications. Brachial plexus injury or thoracic outlet syndrome occurred in 1% to 7% of these series. Skin sloughing was reported in 4 (15%) patients in the study by Campbell. In a single-center series, Waldhausen et al. (2016) reported on device-related complications in 22 of 65 patients treated for TIS over a 13-year period. (14)

Summary of Evidence

For individuals who have progressive thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS) due to rib and/or chest wall defects in childhood who receive vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) thoracoplasty, the evidence includes a few case series. Relevant outcomes are symptoms, morbid events, functional outcomes, and treatment-related mortality and morbidity. TIS occurs in a limited patient population. For example, the Boston Center reported results on 31 children treated from 1999 to 2005. The natural history of progressive TIS is worsening pulmonary function and pulmonary insufficiency. Results from case series reported at different specialty centers have demonstrated improvement and/or stabilization in key measures with use of the VEPTR in progressive TIS. This improvement has been noted in measures related to thoracic structure (e.g., Cobb angle for those with scoliosis), growth of the thoracic spine and lung volumes, and stable or improved ventilatory status. While pulmonary function testing is difficult to track in patients suffering with TIS, a study has demonstrated an age-specific increase in forced vital capacity; further still, that same study reported a final forced vital capacity in the range of 50% to 70% of predicted value. Given the usual disease course of worsening thoracic volume and ventilatory status, the stabilization and/or improvement in the clinical measures outlined above would be highly unlikely if not for the intervention. Taken together, these outcomes demonstrate the positive impact of using the VEPTR technology. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology results in a meaningful improvement in the net health outcome.

For individuals with early-onset scoliosis without TIS who receive VEPTR thoracoplasty, the evidence includes a few case series. Relevant outcomes are symptoms, morbid events, functional outcomes, and treatment-related mortality and morbidity. The VEPTR is being evaluated for curves greater than 45° in infants and juveniles without thoracic insufficiency. Similar to TIS, very limited data are available on the use of the VEPTR for early-onset scoliosis without thoracic insufficiency; additionally, little is known about the disease progression of early-onset scoliosis, and therefore little is known regarding the risk-benefit tradeoff of the VEPTR surgery. The evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.

Practice Guidelines and Position Statements

No guidelines or statements were identified.

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

Some currently unpublished trials that might influence this review are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Summary of Key Trials

NCT No.

Trial Name

Planned Enrollment

Completion Date

Unpublished

NCT00689533a

VEPTR Implantation to Treat Children With Early Onset Scoliosis Without Rib Abnormalities: A Prospective Multicenter Study

250

Jan 2016 (unknown)

NCT: national clinical trial.

a Denotes industry-sponsored or cosponsored trial.

Contract:

Each benefit plan, summary plan description or contract defines which services are covered, which services are excluded, and which services are subject to dollar caps or other limitations, conditions or exclusions. Members and their providers have the responsibility for consulting the member's benefit plan, summary plan description or contract to determine if there are any exclusions or other benefit limitations applicable to this service or supply. If there is a discrepancy between a Medical Policy and a member's benefit plan, summary plan description or contract, the benefit plan, summary plan description or contract will govern.

Coding:

There is no specific CPT code for this procedure. The procedure would most likely be reported with the unlisted code 22899.

CODING:

Disclaimer for coding information on Medical Policies

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive.

The presence or absence of procedure, service, supply, device or diagnosis codes in a Medical Policy document has no relevance for determination of benefit coverage for members or reimbursement for providers. Only the written coverage position in a medical policy should be used for such determinations.

Benefit coverage determinations based on written Medical Policy coverage positions must include review of the member’s benefit contract or Summary Plan Description (SPD) for defined coverage vs. non-coverage, benefit exclusions, and benefit limitations such as dollar or duration caps.

CPT/HCPCS/ICD-9/ICD-10 Codes

The following codes may be applicable to this Medical policy and may not be all inclusive.

CPT Codes

22899

HCPCS Codes

None

ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes

Refer to the ICD-9-CM manual

ICD-9 Procedure Codes

Refer to the ICD-9-CM manual

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes

Refer to the ICD-10-CM manual

ICD-10 Procedure Codes

Refer to the ICD-10-CM manual


Medicare Coverage:

The information contained in this section is for informational purposes only. HCSC makes no representation as to the accuracy of this information. It is not to be used for claims adjudication for HCSC Plans.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) does not have a national Medicare coverage position. Coverage may be subject to local carrier discretion.

A national coverage position for Medicare may have been developed since this medical policy document was written. See Medicare's National Coverage at <http://www.cms.hhs.gov>.

References:

1. Campbell RM, Jr., Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The characteristics of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 2003; 85-A (3):399-408. PMID 12637423

2. Campbell RM, Jr. VEPTR: past experience and the future of VEPTR principles. Eur Spine J. Mar 2013; 22 Suppl 2:S106-117. PMID 23354777

3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) - H030009. 2004. Available at <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov> (accessed March 7, 2018).

4. Campbell RM, Jr., Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Aug 2004; 86-A (8):1659-1674. PMID 15292413

5. Flynn JM, Emans JB, Smith JT, et al. VEPTR to treat nonsyndromic congenital scoliosis: a multicenter, mid-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop. Oct-Nov 2013; 33(7):679-684. PMID 23812154

6. Gadepalli SK, Hirschl RB, Tsai WC, et al. Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib device insertion: does it improve pulmonary function? J Pediatr Surg. Jan 2011; 46(1):77-80. PMID 21238644

7. Emans JB, Caubet JF, Ordonez CL, et al. The treatment of spine and chest wall deformities with fused ribs by expansion thoracostomy and insertion of vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib: growth of thoracic spine and improvement of lung volumes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Sep 1 2005; 30(17 Suppl):S58-68. PMID 16138067

8. Motoyama EK, Deeney VF, Fine GF, et al. Effects on lung function of multiple expansion thoracoplasty in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome: a longitudinal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Feb 1 2006; 31(3):284-290. PMID 16449900

9. Waldhausen JH, Redding GJ, Song KM. Vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib for thoracic insufficiency syndrome: a new method to treat an old problem. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 2007; 42(1):76-80. PMID 17208544

10. Skaggs DL, Sankar WN, Albrektson J, et al. Weight gain following vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs surgery in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Nov 1 2009; 34(23):2530-2533. PMID 19927103

11. Mayer OH, Redding G. Early changes in pulmonary function after vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib insertion in children with thoracic insufficiency syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. Jan-Feb 2009; 29(1):35-38. PMID19098643

12. White KK, Song KM, Frost N, et al. VEPTR growing rods for early-onset neuromuscular scoliosis: feasible and effective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. May 2011;469(5):1335-1341. PMID 21213088

13. Farley FA, Li Y, Jong N, et al. Congenital scoliosis SRS-22 outcomes in children treated with observation, surgery, and VEPTR. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Oct 15 2014; 39(22):1868-1874. PMID 25099323

14. Waldhausen JH, Redding G, White K, et al. Complications in using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) in children. J Pediatr Surg. Nov 2016; 51(11):1747-1750. PMID 27397045

15. Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib. Chicago Illinois: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Medical Policy Reference Manual (2018 April) Surgery 7.01.110.

Policy History:

Date Reason
8/15/2018 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged. Reference 14 added.
4/15/2017 Reviewed. No changes.
10/1/2016 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged.
1/1/2015 Reviewed. No changes.
12/15/2013 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged. CPT/HCPCS code(s) updated
1/1/2010 Revised/Updated Entire Document. No change in conditional coverage criteria. .
9/1/2007 Revised/Updated Entire Document
8/1/2005 New Medical Document

Archived Document(s):

Back to Top