Medical Policies - Therapy



Effective Date:07-15-2018



Hippotherapy is considered experimental, investigational and/or unproven.


Hippotherapy, also referred to as equine movement therapy, describes physical therapy using a horse. Hippotherapy has been proposed as a type of physical therapy for patients with impaired walking or balance.

Patients with spastic cerebral palsy frequently have impaired walking ability due to hyperactive tendon reflexes, muscle hypertonias, and increased resistance to increasing velocity of muscle stretch. These abnormalities result in a lack of selective muscle control and poor equilibrium responses. Hippotherapy has been proposed as a technique to decrease the energy requirements and improve walking in patients with cerebral palsy. It is thought that the natural swaying motion of the horse induces a pelvic movement in the rider that simulates human ambulation. In addition, variations in the horse’s movements can also prompt natural equilibrium movements in the rider. Hippotherapy is also being evaluated in patients with multiple sclerosis and developmental disorders such as Down syndrome.

Hippotherapy is a therapeutic intervention that is typically conducted by a physical or occupational therapist and is aimed at improving impaired body function. Therapeutic horseback riding is typically conducted by riding instructors and is more frequently intended as social therapy. It is hoped that the multisensory environment may be beneficial to children with profound social and communication deficits, such as autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia. When considered together, hippotherapy and therapeutic riding are described as equine-assisted activities and therapies. This policy addresses equine-assisted activities that focus on improving physical functions such as balance and gait.

Simulated hippotherapy using a new device has been studied in European centers. Therapeutic interventions using such a device would be conducted in physical and occupational therapy settings and are outside the scope of this policy.


This medical poly was originally created in May 2000 and has been updated regularly with searches of the MEDLINE database. The most recent literature review was conducted through May 2017. Following is a summary of key studies to date.

Cerebral Palsy

Systematic Reviews

A number of systematic reviews on hippotherapy in children with cerebral palsy (CP) have been published. A 2013 meta-analysis included 5 studies on therapeutic horseback riding and 9 studies on hippotherapy with a total of 277 children with spastic CP. (1) Included in the analysis were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that compared pre- and postriding results; 10 of the 14 studies provided level 4 evidence. Methodologic limitations included use of nonvalidated outcome measures and lack of clinically meaningful differences between groups. Reviewers evaluated Gross Motor Function Measures (GMFM) across studies; meta-analysis indicated that short-term hippotherapy (8-10 minutes of total riding time) significantly reduced asymmetrical activity of the hip adductor muscles and could improve postural control in cases of spastic CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System level <5). However, long-term hippotherapy or therapeutic riding (8-22 hours) did not have a statistically significant effect on GMFM in children with spastic CP. A limitation of this meta-analysis is the inclusion of observational studies (pre-post comparisons) without a control group.

In 2011, Zadnikar and Kastrin published a meta-analysis of hippotherapy and therapeutic horseback riding in children with CP. (2) Eight studies meeting inclusion criteria (quantitative study design, outcomes that included postural control or balance) were selected. The meta-analysis included 84 children with CP in the intervention groups and 89 children in the comparison groups (39 with CP, 50 nondisabled). The treatment effect on postural control or balance showed a positive effect in 76 (90%) of the 84 children in the intervention groups. In the comparison group of 39 children with CP, 21 (54%) experienced positive effects from the comparison treatment, which consisted of continuation of their weekly physical therapy and/or occupational therapy, or sitting on a barrel or in an artificial saddle. Although this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001), the clinical significance of the effect cannot be determined from this analysis. In addition, the analysis found heterogeneity among the studies, which typically would preclude meta-analysis, and a funnel plot showed asymmetry, indicating a possible publication bias. Finally, the inclusion of poor-quality studies in the meta-analysis further limited clinical interpretation.

Randomized Controlled Trials

A 2009 RCT included children ages 4 to 12 years with CP who completed a 10-week session of hippotherapy with pre- and posttreatment assessments completed by 72 families (representing 35 intervention and 37 control subjects). (3) Randomization to hippotherapy or a waiting-list control with usual therapy was stratified by age and level of gross motor function. The physical therapist assessor was blinded to randomization, and participants were asked not to mention if they had completed the intervention at the time of the assessment. No differences between the hippotherapy and control groups were found for functional status (therapist-assessed) or child-reported quality of life. Minor differences were found in parent-reported quality of life and child health scores in the domain of family cohesion. Overall, hippotherapy did not have a clinically significant impact on children with CP.

McGibbon et al. (2009) investigated the impact of hippotherapy on symmetry of adductor muscle activity during walking in children with spastic CP. (4) In phase 1 of the trial, 47 children (age range, 4-16 years) with spastic CP were randomized to a single 10-minute session of hippotherapy or barrel sitting. Adductor muscle symmetry was measured before and after the session. The hippotherapy group demonstrated a statistically significant difference in adductor symmetry after this single intervention. Six children went on to participate in a phase 2, 36-week study (12 weeks without hippotherapy [baseline], 12 weeks of weekly hippotherapy, 12 weeks without intervention). Four of 6 subjects showed improved symmetry during walking after 12 weeks of hippotherapy; this improvement was maintained for an additional 12 weeks posttreatment. All 6 children improved on the 66-item GMFM (GMFM-66), and 1 child began walking without a walker after 4 weeks of hippotherapy. Five children improved in at least 1 area of the Self-Perception Profile. The authors noted that the trial had a small sample size in phase 2; spasticity was diversely distributed among subjects, and inclusion criteria led to a sample with mixed characteristics.

In a 2003 study, Benda et al. used remote surface electromyography to assess outcomes in 15 children (age range, 4-12 years) with CP who were randomized to 8 minutes of hippotherapy or sitting stationary astride a barrel. (5) The authors reported that the hippotherapy group showed greater symmetry of muscle activity. The clinical significance of this outcome is uncertain.

In 2015, Kwon et al. published an RCT of hippotherapy in children (age range, 4-10 years) with CP. (6) Ninety-one subjects were randomized to hippotherapy (30 minutes twice weekly) or to home-based aerobic exercise, both for 8 consecutive weeks. Significant differences in composite measures of gross motor function improvement using the GMFM-88 and -66 were observed between groups. Trial limitations included the unclear clinical significance of the outcomes, uncertain attributes of the control group treatment, and lack of long-term outcomes.

Case Series

In 2002, Sterba et al. reported on the results of an 18-week horseback riding intervention in 17 subjects with CP. (7) GMFM was assessed before and after a once weekly horseback-riding program; after 18 weeks, GMFM total score improved by 7.6%, and returned to baseline 6 weeks after the program ended.

Section Summary: Cerebral Palsy

Four RCTs were identified comparing hippotherapy with a control, only 1 of which involved usual physical therapy and blinded outcomes assessment. The trial with blinded outcome assessment showed no difference between groups in functional status at follow-up, while other trials reported significant between-group differences, which suggests that observed differences may have been due to bias.

Multiple Sclerosis

The use of hippotherapy for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) was addressed in a 2010 systematic review of 3 studies. (8) Included in the review was a comparative study by Silkwood-Sherer and Warmbier (2007), which found that 14 weekly sessions of hippotherapy significantly improved balance in 9 patients with MS compared with a control group of 6 patients. (9) Each of the other 2 studies in the review, both case series, included 11 subjects; these studies also reported improvements in balance with hippotherapy. Reviewers concluded that these studies provided emerging evidence that hippotherapy could improve balance in persons with MS, although they acknowledged the small sample sizes, lack of randomization (especially given the variable nature of MS), and lack of controls in 2 studies.

A 2011 study compared therapeutic horseback riding (with nontherapist riding instructors) and traditional physical therapy in 27 patients with MS. (10) The therapeutic horseback riding focused on progressively challenging the rider’s motor skills and the individualized physical therapy consisted of aerobic, balance, strengthening, and flexibility exercise sessions. The interventions were self-selected and were provided in 20 sessions over 6 months. The therapeutic horseback riding group showed a significant improvement on the balance subscale of the Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment and 2 gait parameters (stride time, ground reaction forces). Five (42%) of 12 horseback riders showed a clinically significant improvement. Gait speed and cadence and scores on the Extended Disability Status Scale and the Barthel Index did not improve. No significant change was found in the control group. It was not reported whether the changes found after therapeutic horseback riding were significantly greater than those of the physical therapy control group.

A 2015 RCT by Frevel and Maurer compared an internet-based home training program to hippotherapy in 18 patients with MS. (11) In this study; hippotherapy was considered the control intervention and the home training program the experimental intervention. Although both intervention groups showed significant improvement in static and dynamic balance capacity, no significant differences were found between groups. The trial had weak statistical power to detect a difference between treatments. It cannot be determined from this trial whether hippotherapy is more effective than standard physical therapy.


Lee et al. (2014) conducted a small randomized trial of hippotherapy for recovery of gait and balance in 30 patients poststroke. (12) Patients were selected for the study if they could walk independently or with a walking aid, had spasticity in a paretic lower extremity of less than 2 on the Ashworth Scale, and could train for more than 30 minutes. Patients were randomized to hippotherapy or treadmill for 30 minutes, 3 days a week, for 8 weeks. At the end of training, gait speed and step length asymmetry ratio were assessed and balance was measured with the Berg Balance Scale. The hippotherapy group showed significant improvements in balance, gait speed, and step length asymmetry, while the treadmill training group improved only in step length asymmetry. Improvements in gait speed and step length asymmetry were significantly greater for the hippotherapy group than for the treadmill group.

Other Gait and Balance Disorders

Comparative studies of hippotherapy and other treatments for the outcomes of balance and gait have been conducted in community-dwelling subjects. (13-15) Although they showed some improved outcomes, the study subjects included did not have any balance or gait disorders, and so the clinical importance of the findings is unclear. A 2013 prospective U.S. study of 9 older adults (mean age, 76.4 years) with balance deficits found improvements in balance and quality of life measured with a pretest-posttest design. (16) Without a comparison group, it is uncertain to what extent the improvements can be attributed to hippotherapy.

Silkwood-Sherer et al. (2012) reported on the efficacy of hippotherapy in a convenience sample of 16 children with mild-to-moderate balance deficits secondary to a variety of disorders. (17) The most common diagnoses were CP (n=5), Down syndrome (n=3), developmental coordination disorder (n=2), and autism (n=2). Baseline and posttreatment Pediatric Balance Scale tests were videotaped and sent in randomized order to 3 pediatric physical therapists for scoring. The Activities Scale for Kids?Performance questionnaires were completed by the children or their parents. Hippotherapy sessions, conducted twice weekly for 6 weeks, yielded significant improvements on the Pediatric Balance Scale (from a median of 49.0 to 53.0) and the Activities Scale for Kids?Performance (from a median of 81.7 to 92.1). This study lacked a control group.

Giagazoglou et al. (2012) reported on the effect of hippotherapy on balance and strength in a controlled trial of 19 adolescents with intellectual disability. (18) Balance and strength were assessed with a pressure platform before and after 10 weeks of both hippotherapy (n=10) and the nonintervention control (n=9). There were no significant differences between groups in double leg stance or left leg stance; however, there were significant group-by-time interactions in balance with the right leg stance. Measures of strength were improved following hippotherapy, with significant group-by-time interactions. This study is lacked an active therapy control group.

In another small study (2007) of 12 patients with spastic spinal cord injury, hippotherapy resulted in short-term improvements in spasticity and well-being. (19)

Ongoing and Unpublished Clinical Trials

Bunketorp Kall et al. reported an ongoing randomized trial of hippotherapy in the late recovery phase following stroke (NCT01372059). (20) The study has an expected enrollment of 123 patients with an estimated completion date of December 2016 (ongoing).

Summary of Evidence

For individuals who have cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, stroke, or other gait and balance disorders who receive hippotherapy, the evidence includes randomized trials and case series. Relevant outcomes include symptoms and functional outcomes. Studies in cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and other indications have had variable findings. The randomized trials are generally small and have significant methodologic problems. In the largest randomized trial conducted to date (72 children), which had blinding outcome assessment, hippotherapy had no clinically significant impact on children with cerebral palsy. There are no randomized controlled trials showing that hippotherapy is superior to alternative treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis. Hippotherapy for other indications has been compared primarily with no intervention and has not been shown to be more effective than other active therapies. The evidence is insufficient to determine the effects of the technology on health outcomes.


Each benefit plan, summary plan description or contract defines which services are covered, which services are excluded, and which services are subject to dollar caps or other limitations, conditions or exclusions. Members and their providers have the responsibility for consulting the member's benefit plan, summary plan description or contract to determine if there are any exclusions or other benefit limitations applicable to this service or supply. If there is a discrepancy between a Medical Policy and a member's benefit plan, summary plan description or contract, the benefit plan, summary plan description or contract will govern.



Disclaimer for coding information on Medical Policies

Procedure and diagnosis codes on Medical Policy documents are included only as a general reference tool for each policy. They may not be all-inclusive.

The presence or absence of procedure, service, supply, device or diagnosis codes in a Medical Policy document has no relevance for determination of benefit coverage for members or reimbursement for providers. Only the written coverage position in a medical policy should be used for such determinations.

Benefit coverage determinations based on written Medical Policy coverage positions must include review of the member’s benefit contract or Summary Plan Description (SPD) for defined coverage vs. non-coverage, benefit exclusions, and benefit limitations such as dollar or duration caps.


The following codes may be applicable to this Medical policy and may not be all inclusive.

CPT Codes

97110, 97112



ICD-9 Diagnosis Codes

Refer to the ICD-9-CM manual

ICD-9 Procedure Codes

Refer to the ICD-9-CM manual

ICD-10 Diagnosis Codes

Refer to the ICD-10-CM manual

ICD-10 Procedure Codes

Refer to the ICD-10-CM manual

Medicare Coverage:

The information contained in this section is for informational purposes only. HCSC makes no representation as to the accuracy of this information. It is not to be used for claims adjudication for HCSC Plans.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) does not have a national Medicare coverage position. Coverage may be subject to local carrier discretion.

A national coverage position for Medicare may have been developed since this medical policy document was written. See Medicare's National Coverage at <>.


1. Tseng SH, Chen HC, Tam KW. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of equine assisted activities and therapies on gross motor outcome in children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. Jan 2013; 35(2):89-99. PMID 22630812

2. Zadnikar M, Kastrin A. Effects of hippotherapy and therapeutic horseback riding on postural control or balance in children with cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. Aug 2011; 53(8):684-691. PMID 21729249

3. Davis E, Davies B, Wolfe R, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of therapeutic horse riding on the quality of life, health, and function of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. Feb 2009; 51(2):111-119; discussion 188. PMID 19191844

4. McGibbon NH, Benda W, Duncan BR, et al. Immediate and long-term effects of hippotherapy on symmetry of adductor muscle activity and functional ability in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jun 2009; 90(6):966-974. PMID 19480872

5. Benda W, McGibbon NH, Grant KL. Improvements in muscle symmetry in children with cerebral palsy after equine-assisted therapy (hippotherapy). J Altern Complement Med. Dec 2003; 9(6):817-825. PMID 14736353

6. Kwon JY, Chang HJ, Yi SH, et al. Effect of hippotherapy on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. Jan 2015; 21(1):15-21. PMID 25551626

7. Sterba JA, Rogers BT, France AP, et al. Horseback riding in children with cerebral palsy: effect on gross motor function. Dev Med Child Neurol. May 2002; 44(5):301-308. PMID 12033715

8. Bronson C, Brewerton K, Ong J, et al. Does hippotherapy improve balance in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. Sep 2010; 46(3):347-353. PMID 20927000

9. Silkwood-Sherer D, Warmbier H. Effects of hippotherapy on postural stability, in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. J Neurol Phys Ther. Jun 2007; 31(2):77-84. PMID 17558361

10. Munoz-Lasa S, Ferriero G, Valero R, et al. Effect of therapeutic horseback riding on balance and gait of people with multiple sclerosis. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. Oct-Dec 2011; 33(4):462-467. PMID 22452106

11. Frevel D, Maurer M. Internet-based home training is capable to improve balance in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. Feb 2015; 51(1):23-30. PMID 24755773

12. Lee CW, Kim SG, Yong MS. Effects of hippotherapy on recovery of gait and balance ability in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. Feb 2014; 26(2):309-311. PMID 24648655

13. Kim SG, Lee CW. The effects of hippotherapy on elderly persons' static balance and gait. J Phys Ther Sci. Jan 2014; 26(1):25-27. PMID 24567669

14. Araujo TB, Silva NA, Costa JN, et al. Effect of equine-assisted therapy on the postural balance of the elderly. Rev Bras Fisioter. Sep-Oct 2011; 15(5):414-419. PMID 22002189

15. De Araujo TB, de Oliveira RJ, Martins WR, et al. Effects of hippotherapy on mobility, strength and balance in elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. May-Jun 2013; 56(3):478-481. PMID 23290005

16. Homnick DN, Henning KM, Swain CV, et al. Effect of therapeutic horseback riding on balance in community-dwelling older adults with balance deficits. J Altern Complement Med. Jul 2013; 19(7):622-626. PMID 23360659

17. Silkwood-Sherer DJ, Killian CB, Long TM, et al. Hippotherapy--an intervention to habilitate balance deficits in children with movement disorders: a clinical trial. Phys Ther. May 2012; 92(5):707-717. PMID 22247403

18. Giagazoglou P, Arabatzi F, Dipla K, et al. Effect of a hippotherapy intervention program on static balance and strength in adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. Nov 2012; 33(6):2265-2270. PMID 22853887

19. Lechner HE, Kakebeeke TH, Hegemann D, et al. The effect of hippotherapy on spasticity and on mental well-being of persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Oct 2007; 88(10):1241-1248. PMID 17908564

20. Bunketorp Kall L, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Blomstrand C, et al. The effects of a rhythm and music-based therapy program and therapeutic riding in late recovery phase following stroke: a study protocol for a three-armed randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2012; 12:141. PMID 23171380

21. Hippotherapy. Chicago, Illinois: Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Medical Policy Reference Manual (2017 March) Therapy: 8.03.12.

Policy History:

7/15/2018 Reviewed. No changes.
7/15/2017 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged.
7/15/2016 Reviewed. No changes.
2/1/2015 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged.
9/1/2011 Document updated with literature review. Coverage unchanged. Rationale section was completely rewritten and the description section revised.
4/1/2009 Revised/updated entire document. This policy is no longer scheduled for routine literature review and update.
2/1/2007 Revised/updated entire document
10/15/2004 Revised/updated entire document
5/1/2000 New medical document

Archived Document(s):

Title:Effective Date:End Date:
Back to Top